@InProceedings{MachaieieCruBarSilOli:2017:AnCoEf,
               author = "Machaieie, Helder Arlindo and Cruz, Carla Bernadete Madureira and 
                         Barros, Rafael Silva de and Silva, Cleverson Guizan and Oliveira, 
                         Eduardo Negri de",
                title = "An{\'a}lise comparativa da efici{\^e}ncia na 
                         corre{\c{c}}{\~a}o atmosf{\'e}rica dos m{\'o}dulos ATCOR, DOS 
                         e solu{\c{c}}{\~a}o USGS nas imagens TM-Landsat 5 e OLI-Landsat 
                         8",
            booktitle = "Anais...",
                 year = "2017",
               editor = "Gherardi, Douglas Francisco Marcolino and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz 
                         Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de",
                pages = "1963--1970",
         organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 18. (SBSR)",
            publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
             abstract = "The radiation that leaves the earth surface to remote sensing 
                         satellites is modified by scattering and absorption effects of 
                         gases and particulates that compose the atmosphere and 
                         consequently the flux that reaches the sensor contains a loss or 
                         an addition of radiation by scattering or absorption. In order to 
                         reduce the interference of the atmosphere many companies and 
                         single researchers have made effort in order to develop models for 
                         correction of remote sensing acquired products. The aim of this 
                         work is to compare the efficiency of three different atmospheric 
                         models for TM-Landsat 5 and OLI-Landsat 8 Image correction, namely 
                         ATCOR model, DOS model and USGS solution. We evaluated the 
                         difference between the apparent reflectance and the surface 
                         reflectance resulted from the application of each of the three 
                         models on TM-Landsat 5 and OLI-Landsat 8 images. The models showed 
                         distinct results especially in the visible region of 
                         electromagnetic spectrum. It has been found that for the same 
                         target and the same atmospheric model the results for TM-Landsat 5 
                         image may differ from the OLI-Landsat 8 image results. The ATCOR 
                         model seemed to overestimate the surface reflectance, especially 
                         in the TM-Landsat 5 image. The USGS solution showed good 
                         performance for both TM-Landsat 5 and OLI-Landsat 8 image and for 
                         all analyzed targets. The DOS model showed similar results to USGS 
                         solution for OLI-Landsat 8 image but also showed some 
                         inconsistencies for TM-Landsat 5 image.",
  conference-location = "Santos",
      conference-year = "28-31 maio 2017",
                 isbn = "978-85-17-00088-1",
                label = "59472",
             language = "pt",
         organisation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
                  ibi = "8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PSLPMP",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PSLPMP",
           targetfile = "59472.pdf",
                 type = "Corre{\c{c}}{\~a}o atmosf{\'e}rica",
        urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}